Showing posts with label communism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communism. Show all posts

Thursday, June 04, 2015

Obama Taught in His Youth to Hate the United States

There sure is a lot of vitriol and hatred being thrown around in this article about Rudy Giuliani's comments. I have to say that regardless of the veracity of the messenger, the message seems to be true.

1. Obama was surrounded by socialists and communists while growing up; his father, step-father, his grandfather, Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Alinsky, etc.

2. Obama was raised the first 9 years of his life in a Muslim home in an Islamic country, Indonesia.

3. Obama was raised as a teen-ager in a white home, in a white neighborhood, not in the ghettos of Chicago.

4. His policies are socialistic in nature; government job creation, "you didn't build that", Obamacare, redistribution of wealth, etc. Programs to take money from someone who earned it and give it to someone who didn't.

5. Proud supporter of gun control. Every dictator, socialist, communist, or banana republic despot's first order of business is gun control

6. Detests saluting his own Presidential Marine Corps honor guard, even though they would lay down their lives, along with the Secret Service, if he was threatened while in their care.

7. To further his agenda, he has circumvented laws, created flimsy excuses, or ignores any criticism.

8. He has openly stated that if Congress will not implement his plans, he will go around them with Executive Orders and Departmental Decrees. If I remember correctly, King George of England, did the same thing back in the 1770's, disbanding the Colonial Assembly more than once when they challenged his policies.

9. He has expressed his continual shame for the United States, their policies, and accomplishments. Not only locally, but he has traveled the world expressing how bad the United States has been in the past.

10. He has been instrumental in trading a suspected traitor, (Bowe Bergdahl, who was charged with desertion) for the release of 5 known and avowed terrorists. Most of them are actively planning damage to this country again.

11. He, along with Hillary Clinton, allowed the Libyan Government to collapse and did nothing while 4 American Citizens died in Benghazi.

12. He is trying to negotiate and talk nice with organizations and mosques that have ties to, as well as members of, terrorists groups, by inviting them to the White House. These same groups insist that they will never capitulate to any demands other than the ones they have already stated publicly, namely; the destruction of the US and Western Europe, along with the implementation of Sharia Law worldwide.

13. His economic policies have destroyed thousands of private businesses in this country.

14. He is spinning the unemployment numbers to make him look good. He states that the rate is around 6%, but if you factor in all those who have simply stopped looking for work and are relying on government assistance, the real number is around 12%, the same as it was when he took office. All his programs have done is removed people from unemployment and moved them to welfare, food stamps, and permanent unemployment checks.

So, I am not sure that Obama really has the best interests of the United States of America at the forefront of all he does. His Hope and Change mantra appears to be changing the US from all that made us the leader in the world into another banana republic taking orders from terrorists and despotic rulers. I respect the Office, even if I detest the person who resides there presently.


Sunday, January 11, 2015

What if Everyone Was on Welfare?


When my son was a Missionary in Boston, Massachusetts, he spent 2 years contacting and teaching people about the Mormon Church. He had the opportunity to work with many people in the Boston Housing Projects. 

While there, he noticed a peculiar thing; each of the project buildings housed hundreds of families and yet, building after building had no one that held a job. Everyone lived of welfare, food stamps, disability, or some other form of assistance. 

The most ironic discovery was that neighbors would meet together to teach other residents how to best utilize the welfare system to receive as much as possible.

So, the questions arises, What if everyone was on welfare?

Except for a few altruistic individuals who have to be productive to remain sane:
  • There would be no one would grow any food.
  • There would be no one to make food.
  • There would be no one to build homes.
  • There would be no one to sell food.
  • There would be no one to rent an apartment from.
  • There would be no one to sell you a home.
  • There would be no one to teach our children.
  • There would be no taxes for the Government to re-distribute.
  • There would be no convenience stores to rob.

The only remaining option would be for the Government to step in and assign everyone a task so that;
  • Food would be produced.
  • Food would be processed.
  • Food would be sold.
  • Homes and apartments would be sold and rented.
  • There would be taxes to re-distribute.
  • There would be convenience stores to rob.

Question: Which country today does this sound like?
  1. Russia
  2. China
  3. Cuba
  4. All of the above
Reminds me of a story in the Reader's Digest years ago.

“In our friendly neighbor city of St. Augustine, (Florida), great flocks of sea gulls are starving amid plenty. Fishing is still good, but the gulls don’t know how to fish. For generations they have depended on the shrimp fleet to toss them scraps from the nets. Now the fleet has moved. …

“The shrimpers had created a Welfare State for the … sea gulls. The big birds never bothered to learn how to fish for themselves and they never taught their children to fish. Instead they led their little ones to the shrimp nets.

“Now the sea gulls, the fine free birds that almost symbolize liberty itself, are starving to death because they gave in to the ‘something for nothing’ lure! They sacrificed their independence for a hand-out.

“A lot of people are like that, too. They see nothing wrong in picking delectable scraps from the tax nets of the U.S. Government’s ‘shrimp fleet.’ But what will happen when the Government runs out of goods? What about our children of generations to come?

“Let’s not be gullible gulls. We … must preserve our talents of self-sufficiency, our genius for creating things for ourselves, our sense of thrift and our true love of independence.” (“Fable of the Gullible Gull,”Reader’s Digest, Oct. 1950, p. 32.)

Courtesy of RI Future
Lest you think the St Augustine story is an anomaly, another article a few years ago from Houma, Louisiana, explains how another group of these Welfare Gulls move from one gravy train to another:

Gulls head inland as spill curbs easy meals

HOUMA — In his four decades of business on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Mike Voisin says he’s never seen a seagull at Motivatit Seafood’s Palm Avenue oyster-processing plant. But today they’re taking over.

The scavenging gulls are on the plant’s roof and in the plant’s trucks, which carry discarded oyster shells from the high-pressure shucking operation. They ride a conveyor belt carrying shucking remains out of the plant while pecking hungrily at the barnacled shells.

They’ve been scavenging at his oyster shells for the last month.

“It’s the darnedest thing because we’ve never seen a seagull here since, well, I don’t even remember,” Voisin said. “Not in the 40 years I’ve been here. They must be really hungry.”

Voisin said he believes closures of bayou seafood-processing plants and the docking of commercial-fishing vessels that would normally attract flocks of hungry gulls have sent them elsewhere for their meals.

Melanie Driscoll, director of bird conservation for the Audubon Society’s Louisiana Coastal Initiative, said she has received reports of more and more gulls heading inland, prowling around restaurants where they haven’t been seen before.

“I’ve heard a lot from locals,” Driscoll said. “There’s a sense that the gulls may be hungry because they basically had a buffet, and now it’s no longer there.”

Photo courtesy of  Daily Mail.com
Welfare parasites begin to think that anything the want is theirs, as this lady in South Shields, England found out recently. 

So, What if everyone was on welfare?

Now you know.

Friday, August 15, 2014

How to Tell a Conservative from a Progressive

I had an interesting discussion with my college-age grandson last night. It centered mainly on the 2 different ideologies in our country, how they differ, and is there any reconciliation. I asked him to explain to me his understanding of the difference between Conservatism and Progressivism.

His answer ran along the lines that Conservatives don't want change, preferring the status-quo or what worked in the past; while Progressives are for change, the change needed to fix what is wrong.

He was correct in explaining the definition of the terms according to Webster, but he did not understand the differences in their ideologies. Here is how I see the differences.

Conservatives believe:
  1. The Individual is the backbone of society,
  2. In the power and goodness of the Individual; that left to themselves, the Individual will try to better themselves and society,
  3. That Individuals are best able to choose their destiny, what is best, and can collectively govern themselves successfully,
  4. That Individuals should be rewarded for their productivity and value to the society.
  5. That there are eternal truths and laws that never change, that obedience to these truths will always bring the same results.
Progressives believe:
  1. The  Individual only exists to strengthen and promote the good of the Society,
  2. That Individuals can not be trusted to choose what is right; that left to themselves, the Individual will lie, cheat, and steal from others and the Society,
  3. That Society must monitor and regulate the Individual to prevent abuses, (corporations are now Individuals, as well,)
  4. That Society should reward all individuals equally, regardless of their productivity or value to society.
  5. That all truth is relative and changeable; that situations, circumstances, and desires dictate what is truth.
Using these definitions, we can see that Conservatives are generally found in:
  1. The Republican, Tea Party, Libertarian and Independent political parties,
  2. Countries where democracy exists, such as; The United States, Switzerland, Germany and maybe England, France, Spain and Italy.
While Progressives are generally found in:
  1. The Democrat, Socialist and Communist political parties,
  2. Socialist, Communist and other totalitarian governments, such as; Russia, China, Cuba, Iran, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, The Taliban, etc.
So, taking these things into consideration, we can see that it is fairly difficult to form any compromises with such extreme positions. 
  1. Either the Individual is the backbone of society or they are the fodder that feeds society.
  2. Individuals have innate goodness and can be trusted or they can never be trusted. If they can only be trusted some of the time, who decides when they can be trusted and when they can't?
  3. If we have bee-watchers watching the bee-watcher, who is watching the bee-watcher, who is watching the . . . who will be left for the bee-watchers to watch?
  4. If you reward everyone equally, regardless of their value or performance, won't the productive individuals loose their ambition to succeed and how can we ever motivate the under-productive to pull their own weight?
  5. Without definable, unchanging truths, how can faith be established in laws or governments?
We also find Progressives slandering the Conservatives, labeling them as; greedy, selfish, stingy, and hoarders, while they applaud their idealistic goals of equal distribution of wealth, health and happiness. The Progressive motto, "the greatest good for the greatest number" sounds very great and good, but what about "the smallest group that is sacrificed for the good of the largest group"? Do they have a voice in the matter?

All people have an obligation to help those less fortunate than themselves, but Conservatives believe that is a choice for the Individual to make, not a mandate from the Government who will take what they think is needed to invest in a cause whether the Individual supports the cause or not.

Wait, who are "they"? In a Progressive Society, who governs, who decides, who controls the money and the people? 

Those who instigated the system. Individuals. 

But Progressives don't believe that Individuals can be trusted to make the right choices and it looks like they may be right. There has never been a Progressive/Socialistic/Communistic/Totalitarian government where the leaders have not stolen, conscripted, taxed, or taken everything they possibly can from the Society. Russia, China, Nazi Germany, Vietnam, Columbia, England, France or the United States of America, the story is all the same. Take as much as you can as fast as you can.

Every deposed dictator left office with hundreds of millions of dollars in their personal bank accounts. Who was the King of Graft?

The Palestinian Liberation Organization had been given billions of dollars to help them establish a homeland in the Middle East. When Yassar Arafat, the leader of the PLO, died, it was discovered that he had over $2 BILLION US DOLLARS socked away in Swiss bank accounts. His posterity is still fighting with the PLO over who has the rights to the money.

Leaders in our own country enter the Congress or other government service with modest incomes and retire as multi-millionaires, with millions more accumulated as they dance around the speaking circuits. Hillary Clinton stated that when she and her husband left the White House, they were so deep in debt they were paupers, but 14 years later, they have a net worth of over $80 MILLION dollars. Bill Clinton even received $500,000 for a speech he never gave.

Well, these are all just facts. You, the reader will need to determine whether our country will be better off with the Progressive path or the Conservative course. 

Choose wisely or someone else will choose it for you.

Photos courtesy: http://lonelyconservative.com/2013/12/saturday-funnies-137/